Nowadays more and more people mistake digital photography for classic photography. Some people are simply too young to have owned an old film camera, others don’t care about electronics so much. There are extreme opinions on both sides. The classic photography adepts would burn the digital photography heretics on stakes because they dare alter reality. And the debate become more and more interesting as professionals step in. Those who use digital photography as an art, are aware of the advantages of classic photography as well, and can’t tell witch is best.
The ones that stand behind classic photography say that the digitals arts have managed to alter and disguise reality in such a way that the ordinary viewer of a certain picture is not even allowed to express his beliefs. Of course, the macro function is subject of this affirmation, it and its blurring effects. The macro returns different shades of faded colors and objects, therefore if someone looks at that certain picture he will be forced to look at the center subject, as everything else is blurred already. Classic photography militants argue this function and state that the picture can not be individually critiqued anymore, because it will transmit the same image to all viewers. Those who want to comment upon the macro-ed picture will not be able to create an outline because they are forced to view only the central piece. The extremists of classic photography forgot they are also using flash and now argue flash pictures also. They say that if a picture is taken at night, using a flash , then it will return a digital photography image. These people claim that night pictures must be taken as they come, at moonlight and not by using devices to bring light to a single point.
On the other hand, those who are not as reluctant to new technologies, praise digital photography. They praise the macro as it offers them what they need: a picture with a visible subject. They don’t want different individuals to come and point out other attraction points in their image, they simply want everyone to see what they saw when they looked at a certain scene or person. And about the flash, some people laugh when they hear that … “flash is evil”.
No matter where you stand in this debate, the truth is that digital photography is not here to ruin the taste of classic photos. This form of photography is not only easier and more accessible, but also let expensive and more versatile than classic photography.. snapfish review
